we make a big deal out of sex. a super big deal. especially, but not just, female sex. it's not ok to be a teen acting on your new sexual desires*. you can't explore that sexual desire. if you like to have 2 lovers, you will be enjoyed in the moment then disrespected after the fact. if you enjoy one night stands you're a sinner, a skank, a ho, someone cheap, someone giving out for free. regardless of the fact that sometimes you meet and the feeling is just there. certain deeds are just wrong. men can't enjoy anal sex coz that's for the weaker sex. men can't just enjoy the female for the wonderful gift she's giving him (he wants it and is happy to meet someone who doesn't mind doing it) without slanging her afterward for being cheap, a slut, easy.
so many rules. so much shaming. so much telling females they're wrong if they supply the demand. so much telling females they're guilty if they pleased many men when those men wanted that from them. men are quite happy to use the female body but when it's over they'll disrespect her spirit. girls are happy to have that (easy) girl at the party yet have no respect for her after the boys have chewed her up and spat her out. where is their anger at the guys for being such assholes, users, disrespectful?
*even though it is ok for adults to shove their sexual desires down throats of babes
Saturday, June 13, 2015
guys and anal sex
what is it with guys and anal sex? they're so driven to want to do it to girls but heaven forbid we want to do it to them.
when i asked my bf if i could do that to him he was repulsed and said 'yuk i'm not doing that'. 'that' like it's some really disgusting thing to do. something only a lowly female would do. some shit ass person who is beneath him .. he's above that shit.
he crapped on about exit only, men aren't made for that blah blah blah.
what he's really saying is coz i'm female i am made for that and there is no 'exit only' with women - a seriously misogynistic thing to think.
he wants me to do it and not just do it, but readily do it, enjoy it, want to do that for him. coz he wants it, he think i should do it, coz i'm female, and just naturally want to please the man.
i know there are chicks out there who like it, enjoy it, it turns them on and they can climax that way. i also know there are chicks out there doing it out of obligation coz their bf is in the mood for sex but doesn't have a condom and doesn't want to risk pregnancy (or he thinks her butt is sexy), selflessly, so he can get his rocks off.
i don't 'not' enjoy it. it's not that it bothers me or i'm prudish in that way and have a firm belief in exit only. what's ticks me off is he won't let me do it to him in return and acts as though anal sex is a really lowly thing for him to do. i asked him "if it's a low thing to do then then why are you asking me to do it?" he fell silent and I felt enraged.
i'd do it .. if the man would do it too. i won't be anyone's lowly female doing 'that which is too disgusting' a man just won't do it. hypocrites!!!!!!
males seem to think because they have an appendage that will benefit from the use of the female ass we should do it for them; but we should not have the use of their ass in the same way because we have no such appendage.
i know there are girls out there who can relate to this.
when i asked my bf if i could do that to him he was repulsed and said 'yuk i'm not doing that'. 'that' like it's some really disgusting thing to do. something only a lowly female would do. some shit ass person who is beneath him .. he's above that shit.he crapped on about exit only, men aren't made for that blah blah blah.
what he's really saying is coz i'm female i am made for that and there is no 'exit only' with women - a seriously misogynistic thing to think.
he wants me to do it and not just do it, but readily do it, enjoy it, want to do that for him. coz he wants it, he think i should do it, coz i'm female, and just naturally want to please the man.
i know there are chicks out there who like it, enjoy it, it turns them on and they can climax that way. i also know there are chicks out there doing it out of obligation coz their bf is in the mood for sex but doesn't have a condom and doesn't want to risk pregnancy (or he thinks her butt is sexy), selflessly, so he can get his rocks off.
i don't 'not' enjoy it. it's not that it bothers me or i'm prudish in that way and have a firm belief in exit only. what's ticks me off is he won't let me do it to him in return and acts as though anal sex is a really lowly thing for him to do. i asked him "if it's a low thing to do then then why are you asking me to do it?" he fell silent and I felt enraged.
i'd do it .. if the man would do it too. i won't be anyone's lowly female doing 'that which is too disgusting' a man just won't do it. hypocrites!!!!!!
males seem to think because they have an appendage that will benefit from the use of the female ass we should do it for them; but we should not have the use of their ass in the same way because we have no such appendage.
i know there are girls out there who can relate to this.
Friday, June 12, 2015
free the nipple
there is a free the nipple movement and i can see where they're going with that. why are men's nipples ok and female nipples aren't. in fact why are men's chests ok while female chests are not? of course the answer is we've turned female breasts into sexual organs and once something becomes a sex object it must remain hidden for fear it will turn people on. sex and the public supposedly don't go together (but generally sex and the public go hand in hand for advertisers).
“It is illegal for women to go topless in most cities, yet you can buy a magazine of a woman without her top on at any 7-11 store. So you can sell breast, but you cannot wear breast, in America.” – Violet Rose
men were once not allowed to go around topless and they protested for their right to do so and a year later they could.
there are those who might assume women could do the same right now, however, there are a couple of serious things to consider.
1) when men fought for chest rights they were not sexualised so their nakedness was not a threat to other men or how they might be treated (i.e. groped, raped etc.), and men were allowed to go around topless in private i.e. around the house and backyards (this is not the case in many instances for women)
2) women are highly sexualised in the media which would impede our ability to go around topless without fear of being victimised (i.e. groped, raped, shamed etc.)
3) men grope women's breasts in night clubs, on beaches, where ever they damn well please because they can, they have the power and we've created a lovely thing called rape culture, thus women being topless around men would add to their desire to attack us and victimise us
4) we shame women's bodies at an alarming rate, if you don't look a certain way - have acceptable nipples, acceptable breasts, acceptable bodies (and ideal placed upon us by men) people berate you and treat you like you have no right to exist let alone go around half naked (even though unattractive men can)
5) the vast majority of women feel insecure about their bodies, if they went around topless and got harassed or berated the protest wouldn't work because we'd all go running for cover - and the protest cannot work if only women deemed acceptable win the fight to go around topless
6) the protest can only be done by those brave enough to go around topless and weather the treatment we'd endure for putting up this fight
7) due to the nature of the sexualised breast it would take women longer to win this war and even if we end up being allowed to expose our nipples this won't guarantee we'll be equal to men as a result and without a doubt all those exposed nipples/breasts would be photographed and end up on social media without our consent
men were once not allowed to go around topless and they protested for their right to do so and a year later they could.
there are those who might assume women could do the same right now, however, there are a couple of serious things to consider.
1) when men fought for chest rights they were not sexualised so their nakedness was not a threat to other men or how they might be treated (i.e. groped, raped etc.), and men were allowed to go around topless in private i.e. around the house and backyards (this is not the case in many instances for women)
2) women are highly sexualised in the media which would impede our ability to go around topless without fear of being victimised (i.e. groped, raped, shamed etc.)
3) men grope women's breasts in night clubs, on beaches, where ever they damn well please because they can, they have the power and we've created a lovely thing called rape culture, thus women being topless around men would add to their desire to attack us and victimise us
4) we shame women's bodies at an alarming rate, if you don't look a certain way - have acceptable nipples, acceptable breasts, acceptable bodies (and ideal placed upon us by men) people berate you and treat you like you have no right to exist let alone go around half naked (even though unattractive men can)
5) the vast majority of women feel insecure about their bodies, if they went around topless and got harassed or berated the protest wouldn't work because we'd all go running for cover - and the protest cannot work if only women deemed acceptable win the fight to go around topless
6) the protest can only be done by those brave enough to go around topless and weather the treatment we'd endure for putting up this fight
7) due to the nature of the sexualised breast it would take women longer to win this war and even if we end up being allowed to expose our nipples this won't guarantee we'll be equal to men as a result and without a doubt all those exposed nipples/breasts would be photographed and end up on social media without our consent
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)